Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Dear Angelina Jolie, keep your SMILE

This letter to Angelina Jolie is a follow up to my first letter addressing her decision to remove her breasts in hopes of avoiding developing breast cancer.  In my first letter, I share how the BRCA gene is not a definitive correlation in the development of breast cancer and how damage to the mitochondria is actually the origin of the development of cancer at the cellular level, NOT damage to DNA.  Damage to the nucleus and DNA happens after damage to the mitochondria and thus targeted gene therapies and radical surgeries for those carrying the BRCA gene do not have the ability to stop the progression or development of cancer  (to read more, reference my first letter:  http://mkloek.blogspot.com/2016/06/an-open-letter-to-angelina-jolie-re.html).

In this letter, I give Angelina Jolie direction on what to focus on in order to truly prevent the development of breast cancer.  Chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery DO NOT prevent the development of cancer.  Further, chemotherapy has been shown to be only 3% effective long-term in curing cancer.  

Dear Angelina Jolie,

Instead of focusing on the fear of getting cancer and electing for a double mastectomy that may or may not have any impact on whether you develop breast cancer, why don't you look at well-researched correlations to breast cancer in diet and lifestyle, make adjustments, and prevent the mutation of genetic factors?

The first correlation that I suggest you explore is the connection between root canals and breast cancer. You may be shocked and ask, what does my smile have to do with my breast tissue?  A lot, in fact.  The last 150 breast cancer patients treated in Paracelsus Clinic in Switzerland found 98% of patients having one or more root canals done on the same meridian as their malignant breast tissue.  Further, Dr. Weston Price and 60 researchers studied the correlation and found 100% of breast cancer patients had root canals on the meridian connected to cancerous breast tissue (The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, http://www.new-cancer-treatments.org/ Articles/RootCanals.html).

Root canals are meant to save a tooth by cleaning out the bacteria, infected nerves, and tissue beneath a tooth.  However, after the procedure, the tooth is now dead.  Bacteria and microbes remain and begin to travel to other areas of the body, including breast tissue.  Thio-ethers are the most dangerous microbes produced by the root canal because they concentrate in the mitochondria of the cell and cause damage.  Damaged mitochondria cause a cascade of events at the cellular level which leads to energy production through fermentation, disrupted apoptosis and cell division, and damaged DNA, all hallmarks of the development of malignant cancer cells in the body.

Root canals have been linked to degenerative diseases since the research of Dr. Price.  In fact, the research of Dr. Price is so convincing that the dentist which invented the root canal, Dr. George Meinig, began speaking against root canals after being exposed to Dr. Price's data.

Angelina Jolie, after your surgery, support your body in preventing breast cancer by avoiding root canals.  The microbes from the root canal can still travel to the lymph nodes and tissue around the breasts leading to damaged mitochondria which can lead to disrupted apoptosis and malignant cancer cell growth.

We love your contributions, movies, and influence and want you to be around for a very long time.  Make sure to find a good, holistic dentist who will not make recommendations like root canals which can potentially lead to cancer.

References:

http://naturaldentistry.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/cnd-breast-cancer-and-root-canals-ad.pdf

Cancer:  Step Outside the Box by Ty Bollinger

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

A culture of isolation, murder, and death

Why do people murder?  This question is vitally important to understand in wake of what has been happening in our nation.  Unfortunately, the answer is not simple and not easy to fix.  It is not something that gun control can change or policy changes or even political marches for awareness can change.

We must change as a nation, one heart at a time.  We have a major cultural issue in that Americans have isolated themselves, given themselves to striving and attaining wealth and possessions to the detriment and loss of familial ties and friendships.  We have sworn off connectedness to independence, isolation, and personal success.  This lack of connectedness allows betrayal, hatred, anger, bitterness, and murder plague our society in the form of murders, disease, and premature death.

My husband is from South Africa and one thing that I love about South African culture is that all the neighbors know each other, talk to each other, and support one another in a very personal, communal manner.  In our neighborhood, it is no surprise that he knows all of our neighbors and daily converses with the neighbors.  South Africa has its own cultural problems such as poverty, violence, gang activity, and murder, but for very different reasons than what we are seeing in America.  In my heart, I always think that a marriage between South African culture and American culture would produce a great, thriving culture.  

The root of murder in any culture is hatred, bitterness, anger, revenge.  A person is not born a murderer or destined to murder.  However, when a young child displays anger and rage repeatedly without learning how to forgive and release anger, this is dangerous.  When a young child does not learn the importance of forgiveness, this child may continue to harbor anger, rage, and bitterness in their heart until they are overtaken and end up killing someone.  Also, when a young child is exposed to severe trauma, violence, and abuse in the home, he or she may also display violence if their isn't sufficient therapy and support to address these traumatic roots.  Even aggressive displays of spanking can imprint trauma, abuse, and shame on a child that negatively shapes their worldview and they way that they interact with themselves and the world.  

Many times, when a person kills, they explain the feeling of being out of body or overtaken by rage.  Sometimes, they are even surprised by their violent action and the fact that they murdered.  In my mind, the premeditated part of murder is the continual obsession in thoughts and emotions of hatred, anger, and rage which many times is displaced to someone not even connected to the person.  However, there are times the murder is connected directly to the person who has hurt, betrayed, and stirred up these past emotions of anger, bitterness, and rage.  

For example, cops that murder may not benefit from training; rather, may need to understand the importance of forgiveness and identify who they hate and who they need to forgive.  This will make them more sensitive to the need at a particular moment of their service and not so vulnerable to make snap decisions out of anger, fear, or trauma from their past.    

People diagnosed with cancer many times need to forgive and release anger and rage from their bodies.  Instead of killing someone else, their hatred, rage, bitterness, and anger is killing their own bodies.  Many times, people who successfully address the underlying emotions and root traumas to their illness end up healthier emotional, spiritually, and physically after a diagnosis than prior to a diagnosis.  

However, many people are still not open and willing to look at the underlying root issues to a cancer diagnosis.  The approach is commonly to attack and kill the cancer growing in the body without a full understanding of why is is there in the first place.  So far, all of my cancer clients have identified people who they need to forgive and release anger towards.  This has made a huge impact on their healing process physically and changed the frequency of energy in their body towards higher vibrations of peace, love, and gratitude.

We would serve our nation, ourselves, and our families well if we ask the questions why and we dedicate ourselves to healing ourselves and those in our immediate circles of influence so that our culture can be healthy and whole again.  

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

The Age of the Moderation Thinkers

She sat licking her ice cream cone as her friend said, "are you allowed to have ice cream since you have cancer?"  She responded, "I can have anything in moderation and I have been struggling to keep weight on, so my oncologist told me to eat anything that helps to gain weight."  "Oh, so you can eat GMOed bovine growth hormone and sugar in moderation and it won't affect the development of your tumor?"

One of my pet peeves as a Nutritional Therapist is to hear people say, "anything  is fine in moderation."  How many people successfully eat ice cream in moderation?  One scoop leads to two which leads to three and one day a week leads to two which eventually leads to every day...  In my head, I think, pesticides, herbicides, rBGH, aluminum, mercury, antibiotics, GMO's, as long as they are in "moderation," won't affect your health?  I always think that "anything in moderation" mentality is avoiding the hard reality or truth that you can't just consume whatever you want and expect to be healthy.  The moderation thinkers want the best of both worlds, to do/eat/think/feel/behave in any way that they want to and expect exceptional results in their health and in their lives.

Any financial advisor, if you told them that you just wanted to spend your money in moderation, ignoring your budget or the reality of your financial situation, would fire you as a client and not see you as someone serious about financial prosperity.  Are you serious about prospering in your health?  Then you probably want to throw "anything in moderation" mentality out of the window.

What I know about "anything in moderation," especially with sugar, is that moderation snowballs into extreme measures of sugar after every meal (even breakfast) and in between meals as well.  Think of it this way:  if I asked you to think about something you are afraid of, but only feel fear in moderation, would you be able to do it?  A little bit of fear is hard to maintain because fear always seems to have a way of growing into immense bouts of fear that does not easily dissipate.  If I entertain fear, it will grow and become the dominant emotion/mentality of the day/moment/week/year.

Back to rBGH.  The problem with many carcinogens is that they are not on the label.  I cannot just look at a container of ice cream and see rBGH on the ingredient label, even though more often than not, it is present.

Further, I have heard too many times, oncologists recommending that their patients eat ice cream in order to combat the side effect of weight loss coming from chemotherapy treatments.  And yet, there are multiple studies linking rBGH to cancer and multiple countries in the world who have banned its use in the food supply.  Beyond rBGH, we also know that sugar feeds cancer cells and suppresses the immune system.  So what is the point of gaining weight with ice cream when, at the same time, you will be feeding cancer cells, suppressing your immune system, and potentially increasing tumor development?  

Here are some quick facts about rBGH:

  • rBGH:  1994 genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH) was approved.  Monsanto created rBGH by modifying naturally occurring bovine growth hormone in cattle so that milk production and profits could increase.
  • rBGH is banned in the European Union, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, Australia, and Israel.  
  • rBGH contains Insulin-Like Growth Factor or IGF-1 which has been linked to tumor development in breast, colrectal, prostate, lung, and lymph cancers
  • rBGH also causes major side effects for cattle, causing the need to use antibiotics, which are also ingested through dairy treated with rBGH.  Antibiotics are a mycotoxin or a fungus which can cause bacteria at the cellular level, protits, to morph and change into a fungal-like component and lead to the eventual development of a tumor.
  • Before 1995 lymph cancer was very rare
  • Americans consume 180 billion pounds of dairy or 650 pounds per American per year!!
  • Lab animals treated with rBGH had huge negative changes in their lymph systems
  • Today, deaths from breast, prostate, lung, pancreatic, and genital cancer combined are less than the deaths from lymph cancer
  • This increase started after rBGH was introduced to our animals
Let's move beyond the mentality of "everything in moderation" so that we can prosper in every area of our lives and have wisdom in what we are allowing to affect our health and wellness.  







Tuesday, June 21, 2016

The $4 cancer cure

Dr. Tullio Simoncini is another doctor who started with conventional training in oncology and now uses the most inexpensive treatment option for cancer.  Dr. Simoncini describes in one interview how he sat in one of his oncology classes listening to his professor say, "We don't fully know or understand what cancer is, cancer is a mystery."  He thought to himself, this doesn't make sense.  How have we studied cancer for so long without understanding what it is?  Further, Dr. Simoncini decided to find out what cancer is so that he could effectively treat his patients.  

He began his internship working with children with cancer on an oncology ward in a hospital.  Dr. Simoncini describes how his heart would break, seeing these children struggling and many of them dying.  He desperately needed to find a cure.

When he started to work with cancer patients with skin cancer, he tried using iodine treatments on the skin.  He saw astounding results.  Through observing the tumors in his patients, he further questioned the color.  Every tumor was white, it looked like fungus, like a mushroom.  He speculated that the tumors were a fungal infection in the body.  Knowing that sodium bicarbonate would eliminate fungus, Dr. Simoncini started to experiment with administering this simple substance.  To his amazement, tumors started to regress with the treatment of sodium bicarbonate.  



In fact, his first patient to use the sodium bicarbonate was an 11-year old who was in a coma after suffering with leukemia.  His mother begged Dr. Simoncini to treat her son and to allow her one more conversation.  Through a glucose and sodium bicarbonate IV, a full day later, her son came out of his coma and began speaking in full sentences to his mother.  

The most incredible part about this story is the fact that oncologists have been using sodium bicarbonate for years when administering chemotherapy to their patients.  The sodium bicarbonate is meant to protect the patients kidneys.  Without sodium bicarbonate, modern oncology may not exist because patients would die too quickly from the acidic/toxic impact of chemotherapy agents such as mustard gas.

What is sodium bicarbonate and why is it working so well for Dr. Simoncini?

Baking soda or sodium bicarbonate is an electron donor and is produced in the stomach, pancreas, and kidneys.  Sodium bicarbonate facilitates the following functions in the body:
  • Helps oxygen dissociate from hemoglobin
  • Neutralizes acid
  • Protects digestive enzymes
  • Increases blood fluids
  • Aids detoxification
  • Anti-inflammatory
  • Anti-fungal
  • Combined with iodine, can affect microbes in the blood
  • Increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastasis
  • Induces cellular alkalization through bicarbonate transport system 
  • Regulates cellular pH through bicarbonate transport system
  • Regulates whole body pH through bicarbonate transport system
  • Regulates cell volume and fluid secretion through bicarbonate transport system
  • Disposes body's major metabolic waste product 
Thus, sodium bicarbonate has many valuable therapeutic functions in the body and has been successfully used by Dr. Simoncini in treating a variety of cancers.  In fact, he has seen well over 1,000 patients going into remission through his administration of sodium bicarbonate through IVs.  

Be careful in googling Dr. Simoncini as he has not escaped persecution and slander to his name by various websites and Internet sites such as "The Quack Watch."  So many amazing holistic doctors and advocates for effective alternative treatments have been chosen to be listed on the Quack Watch that it must now be a prerequisite for being so amazing and ahead of your time that normal people cannot handle your findings and truth in light of mainstream approaches to cancer.  Or is big Pharma simply paying Quack Watch to "expose" highly effective holistic cancer doctors?  

Also, don't be surprised if you find Dr. Simoncini accused of manslaughter for one of his patients.  Because that happened too.  Even though the patient in question was never a patient but simply someone he spoke to over the phone.  

The plot thickens.  And more and more people are being enlightened and awakened to truth and ideas/innovations that could save millions of peoples lives.  Let's continue, despite the challenges, lies, and fear tactics.  Someones life is counting on us and needing the truth.  


Tuesday, June 14, 2016

An Open Letter to the FDA and doctors like Dr. Prados

Dear the FDA and doctors like Dr. Prados,

When I read and learn about the story of Ric's daughter, Crystin, I feel compelled to share and expose their story.

Crystin became diagnosed with a rare brain tumor and was only 4 years old.  Some of the tumor was removed through surgery, but all of it could not be removed.  The type of tumor was called a malignant rhabdoid and was so rare that only 25 people had ever been diagnosed.  All 25 cases had led to death within 4 months to 1 year after the diagnosis.  The oncologists first recommended that Crystin be taken home to die and there was no hope for her.  The only alternative was chemotherapy and radiation which, according to the oncologists, may kill her.


My question for Dr. Prados would be:  when Ric asked you, "Is there anything else you know of, other than chemotherapy or radiation, that can be used for my daughter?"  Why did you say a firm "no" when two of your oncology patients with brain tumors had seen Dr. Burzynski and survived years longer than you expected because of his treatments of antineoplastons?  Why did you lie and not allow Ric to do research on another option of treatment?

Ric ended up suing you, Dr. Prados, for misleading his family and being part of the reason why she did not survive.  Ric stated "We assumed that these people (Dr. Prados included) were oncologists and therefore they study cancer.  We were wrong."  Instead of knowing all options for cancer patients and being well versed in new discoveries and options for cancer patients, current treatment options are pushed:  chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery.  The same options that have been available for over sixty years and have not successfully eradicated the fear of death surrounding this disease.  And yet, there are doctors who do not use chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery and see amazing results, including Dr. Burzynski.

Dr. Prados, why did you push chemotherapy and radiation when Ric and his family started exploring and searching for other options?   Dr. Prados, why did Crystin still receive chemotherapy and radiation in high doses when no one with her type of cancer ever benefitted from this course of action?

Crystin received 6,000 rads of radiation in the course of 4 months.  This is the same amount that people were exposed to if they were within one mile of the atomic bomb at Hiroshima.  Why did this seem like a good idea?  At the same time she was exposed to the radiation of an atomic bomb, Crystin received heavy chemotherapy.  At one point, her parents had to use rubber gloves to change her diapers because she was so toxic from treatments.  Crystin couldn't run, lost balance and vision, and developed the risk of swallowing food into her lungs.  In the midst of all the side effects, the tumor disappeared for a period of time.  The doctors did say that the tumor would come back because of the carcinogenic effect of radiation and chemotherapy.

Ric found information about Dr. Burzynski and started to talk to former patients about his treatment facility in Texas.  Dr. Prados, why did you tell Ric that antineoplastons don't work and that the treatment was so toxic it could do more damage to Crystin?  And why did you label Dr. Burzynski a fraud?  Do you have research and proof about the outrageous claims that you made?  

Ric and his family still decided to take Crystin to see Dr. Burzynski.  For one year, Crystin received antineoplastons and for months, the tumor did not show up again.  After stopping antineoplastons for a few weeks, the tumor came back.  The family, nearly bankrupt from having to pay for treatments out of pocket and not receiving coverage from their health insurance, needed to find a way to put Crystin back on antineoplastons.  Dr. Prados, why did you encourage them to go back on radiation and chemotherapy after all the damage her body suffered from previous treatments and when you had no hope in a cure?

After 3 weeks of being on antineoplastons again, the tumor shrunk 25%.  Nine weeks later, the tumor was gone without the toxic side effects that Crystin experienced on chemotherapy and radiation.  Why Dr. Prados would you ascribe the tumor reduction to residual radiation effects when Crystin had not been on radiation for over 1 year?

Crystin died a few months later.  An autopsy confirmed that there was no cancer in Crystin's body at the time of death.  Rather, Crystin died of neurological necrosis because of the overuse of radiation in her treatments.

The saddest part of the story is that Ric and his family believes that if they had started with Dr. Burzynski and antineoplastons before chemotherapy and radiation, Crystin would still be alive today.
Dr. Prados, you took the Hippocratic oath to become a doctor which states that you are to "first, do no harm."  In light of the death of Crystin, do you believe that you have upheld the Hippocratic oath?  I don't think that Ric's family would believe so.

Here is information about a new trial that Dr. Burzynski is facing because mainstream medicine and the FDA want to strip him of his medical license because of his success and because his treatment was discovered by him and Big Pharma cannot take any of the profits.


What are antineoplastons?  Antineoplastons are polypeptides discovered by Dr. Burzynski which have an anticancer or antitumor effect.  Burzynski studied peptides from human blood and urine for decades and found that people with cancer had less peptides in their urine than people without cancer.  Burzynski was trying to figure out the control factor for normal apoptosis in the body.  Apoptosis is normal cell death.  Tumors develop from cells that are out of control and the normal apoptosis function is turned off for some reason.

He introduced peptide fractions refined from his own urine into cancer cells grown in a lab from M.D. Anderson.  He found some of the peptides to have anticancer properties.  He eventually found that Antineoplaston A had the most broad spectrum of anticancer activity and began focusing on this peptide.  

Through his research, he believes that the body has a backup to the immune system's ability to destroy cancer cells.  Burzynski found that peptides were this backup system which could cause cells failing to go through normal cell death to regulate and begin to normalize apoptosis.  Burzynski sees cancer as a programming error in cell division and cell death and antineoplastons or specific peptides are the solution to reprogram this error.  

Despite Burzynski's success with difficult cases of brain tumors and other cancers, the FDA have continually brought him to court to try to strip him of his medical license.  Oncologists who know about Dr. Burzynski refuse to give information to their patients even when there are no other options left in conventional medicine.  Further, health insurance companies have Dr. Burynski flagged and will not cover his expensive, yet effective treatment protocols.

With everyone but his loyal patients against him, Dr. Burzynski persists to provide this necessary and valuable treatments to all who come to his clinic in Texas.  When will he prevail and be able to mass produce his treatment that seems to be more effective without toxic side effects like chemotherapy and radiation?  He has been battling to win since the 1970's and he will continue until justice and truth prevails in the cancer world.